GPY Essay Health ARTICLES ON HOW TO CONDUCT A LITERATURE REVIEW

ARTICLES ON HOW TO CONDUCT A LITERATURE REVIEW

National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. After having chosen your topic and audience, start by checking the literature and downloading relevant papers. Secondary Sources Unit 5: A Handbook for Students [ebook] Machi, L.

Evaluate the data to determine which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. Determine, if possible, the value of the work.

A solution can be to involve a set of complementary coauthors: This page location is: In many cases, reviewers of the literature will have published studies relevant to the review they are writing.

A Traveler’s Guide to a Done Dissertation. Define a Topic and Audience How to choose which topic to review? Primary Sources Unit 4: Please review our privacy policy.

The first goal of a literature search is to ensure that you are aware of other research in your field. But this is the nature of science [27] — [32]. Given the progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers, today’s reviews of the literature need awareness articles on how to conduct a literature review just of the overall direction and achievements of a field of inquiry, but also of the latest studies, so as not to become out-of-date before they have been published.

Categorize your resources Divide the available resources that pertain to your research into categories reflecting their roles in addressing your research question. You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. It is however advisable to reread the draft one more time before submission, as a last-minute correction of typos, leaps, and articles on how to conduct a literature review sentences may enable the reviewers to focus on providing advice on the content rather than the form.

10 Related Topics  HELP WITH CREATING A THESIS STATEMENT

Are there ideas that contradict each other?

Be Critical and Consistent Reviewing the literature is not stamp collecting. Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author’s point?

Conduct a literature review

For example, compared toin three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity, respectively [2]. Find a Logical Structure Like a well-baked cake, a good review has a number of telling features: It may be more challenging for M. Pautasso M Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases. The goal is to become familiar with the knowledge base of scientific information on the topic so that 1 you can understand the topic and its major concepts; 2 you articles on how to conduct a literature review place your research in context and 3 you can further develop your own ideas.

Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review

When searching the literature for pertinent papers and reviews, the usual rules apply:. Ideas for articles on how to conduct a literature review reviews may come from papers providing lists of key research questions to be answered [9]but also from serendipitous moments during desultory reading and discussions.

10 Related Topics  SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER COVER LETTER EXAMPLE

Use citation searching to track how scholars interact with, and build upon, previous research: Some journals are now favouring the publication of rather short reviews focusing on the last few years, with a limit on the number of words and citations. In step 4, consider the author’s credentials.

Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review

Choosing works by experts in their field gives authority to the materials. Make sure that you only articles on how to conduct a literature review articles and books in those areas, even if you come across fascinating books in other areas. Human Res Develop Rev 4: Inevitably, new papers on the reviewed topic including independently written literature reviews will appear from all quarters after the review has been published, so that there may soon be the need for an updated review.

This may lead in some cases to conflicting views on the merits of the paper, and on how to improve it, but such a situation is better than the absence of feedback.